Confessions of a ‘Notorious Atheist Who Inflitrated the Girl Scouts’
A woman writes a book for the Girl Scouts of the USA and then, a couple of years later, authors a website about nonreligious parenting. Which one ends up as fodder for the conservative media giant Fox News?
Why, the Girl Scouts, of course!
Life is downright wackadoo, I tell you.
So here’s the scoop:
About three years ago, I applied for and won a contract to write a book for the Girl Scouts. My job was to create an 80-page, magazine-style book on media literacy for middle-school-age scouts as part of the organization’s Journey Series. The book, I was told, needed to be creative, fun and educational, but I also was given numerous requirements and guidelines. This was the Girl Scouts, after all. They had strict standards.
Titled MEdia, the book set out to educate girls about how the media works, encourage them to examine the messages they hear, and show them how they, themselves, can use the media to shape a better world. In other words, we wanted to ask the girls to put the ME in media. Get it? The book was all about boosting girls’ self-esteem, and I loved being involved. I kept thinking how much MEdia would have benefited my own awkward, adolescent, 13-year-old self, had it been available 25 years ago.
Anyway, after sending the manuscript to my editors at the Girls Scouts, I was given two more contracts — one to write a senior-level book called BLISS, and another to write a handbook for adult volunteers. All three books went through various layers of editing; but other than a few rewrites, I was mostly uninvolved. The collection came out in December 2010, and the Girl Scouts began using the books in earnest this past fall.
Fast forward to last week when I found my name in a story on The Blaze, a conservative blog founded by Glenn Beck. In the Dec. 27 post, writer Billy Hallowell accuses the Girl Scouts of showing liberal bias by including in MEdia a reference to Media Matters, a website devoted to debunking misinformation by conservative news media — primarily Fox News. (As you can imagine, Beck’s not a big fan.) Hallowell states, “one wonders why the book’s authors, Wendy Thomas Russell and Sarah Goodman [who contributed several profiles to MEdia], would include this as the sole source for getting ‘the word out about media misinformation.’”
Here’s the page. The Media Matters reference is at the bottom.
The Blaze story, which was picked up by The Drudge Report and a handful of other websites, suggested that the Girl Scouts were acting irresponsibly and insidiously — slanting the news and feeding it to young, vulnerable girls. And the response to the story was ferocious. The Blaze got more than 400 comments from its readers, some of whom searched my name on the web, found Relax, It’s Just God, and began printing that I was an atheist. [Read: Shitty Person.]
One woman on Twitter suggested that @WendyRussell (Hey, that’s me!) was being fed information by @AlGore. Another woman left a review on Amazon.com with the headline: “Wendy Thomas Russell is a notorious atheist who infliltrated the Girl Scouts.” She went on to write: “Why would she be allowed to promote her beliefs on an organization that specifically states they serve God? Why would she place her daughter in an organization that serves God when her entire life is devoted to the ridicule of God?”
Wow, right?
It’s as though this woman believed that thinking some thoughts automatically made those thoughts true. (Hmmm, where have I seen that happen before?) Unfortunately, she didn’t stay on my website long enough to read even my most recent post. It was on the pitfalls of stereotyping nonbelievers; funny, that.
Meanwhile, according to The Blaze, a spokeswoman for the Girl Scouts agreed to investigate how Media Matters came to be included in the book, and promised a second printing would delete the Media Matters reference. By then, though, the “scandal” had raised the hackles of the folks over at Fox News. On Dec. 29, Fox ran at least two segments about MEdia. You can watch the Grapevine segment here and the Fox & Friends segment here. [Update: You can also watch this, which ran on the Jan. 7 edition of Fox News Watch.] Fox called for all current versions of the book to be removed from bookshelves immediately.
Comedy Central’s Indecision later satirized the Fox-Girl Scouts showdown under the deadpan headline: Fox News Uncovers Girl Scouts Plot to Destroy America. Sadly, Steven Colbert has yet to weigh in.
***
So how did Media Matters end up in the book I wrote? The truth is, I have no idea.
My final draft read as follows:
The Internet is a breeding ground for “urban legends,” which are false stories told as if true, and then spread quickly. Next time you receive a txt or a forwarded e-mail about something terrible that happened to someone, try to confirm it. The fact-checking site snopes.com investigates everything from urban legends to “news” articles and posts its findings.
That’s it. Just Snopes.
No offense to Media Matters, but I didn’t even know the group existed until last week. And no offense to the Girl Scouts, but, even if I had known about the group, I never would have included it in the book. Media Matters’ slant isn’t only evident in the content, it’s spelled out in the freaking masthead.
So, yeah, not sure what happened there, or who made it happen. But I must confess that I’ve found the whole ordeal highly entertaining. It’s hard not to be a little proud that my little ol’ Girl Scout book is getting so much attention. It’s hard also, not be flattered when someone calls you “notorious” or injects you into the middle of a good, old-fashioned conspiracy theory.
Plus, I’ve always wanted to have something in common with Mark Twain — and now I do.
We both have banned books.


Wendy,
This looks like a great book, but I want the uncensored version thank you very much. I want my daughter (and my troop) to see all points of view, and then to learn to make her own choices (do their own editing).
I can’t believe we are censoring this kind of material from kids.
Agreed! And not sure if you saw this already, but: http://wendythomasrussell.com/notorious-atheist-elevated-to-serial-killer/
Thanks so much, Jennifer.
Your response to this manufactured controversy is truly a breath of fresh air. I’m impressed with your work and am excited to have found a new secular/atheist blog to follow. Can’t wait to read your new book!
That’s great, Julie! So glad you’re here. And thank you!
Well said. My 6 year old will be exploring girl scouts soon and Im glad to see other secular parents involved.
Also, don’t listen to the haters, Media Matters does great work. Judge them by the bile spewed by their enemies.
I wonder what that woman going on about “serving God” would think if she learned that GSA hires atheists and gay people while BSA does not. Something tells me she’d pull her girls out just like that bigot who commented earlier.
I love banned books…and Girl Scout Cookies. Must buy more of both.
Your explanation is lacking. If any professional had their work “hijacked” by another – but especially with clear intent – by a group with a clear bias and agenda – a person with integrity would be livid!
Man up Wendy. Tell the truth, or participate in the the process to find the truth. Anything less is clearly the actions of someone participating in the the whole act!
Thanks for writing, Mike.
You’re making a lot of assumptions here. First of all, my work wasn’t hijacked. I was the author for a book that belongs to the Girl Scouts. This book does not belong to me, and the Girl Scouts do, and always have, had the right to change or add whatever they want. You’re also assuming that the Girl Scouts is “a group with a clear bias and agenda.” If you mean a bias of wanting to lift girls up and give them opportunities to be active citizens, then yes, they have a bias. If you mean an agenda of leadership, honesty and integrity, then you bet they have an agenda. If you mean a bias and agenda of liberal ideology — no. That is simply not the case, as I experienced it. I believe what we have here is a situation in which one person made a mistake, and it wasn’t caught. Media Matters is a name not everyone recognizes (certainly I didn’t). The GSA is likely guilty of not fact-checking, but that’s about it. Now, you may disagree — and conservative news agencies may, too. But have you ever wondered why these suspicious agencies and reporters are more interested in making insinuations than they are about actually finding out the truth? Have you ever wondered why they aren’t interviewing any of the contributors to the book? As the author, I have yet to be contacted by one single reporter. Telling, isn’t it?
You are my hero. Good luck with trying to reason with this crowd – http://www.theblaze.com/stories/author-denies-inserting-media-matters-reference-into-girl-scouts-book/
I’m sure Mark Twain is proud of you.
Thanks, Harry.
Well… I suppose as they say, any publicity is good publicity… but still, a shitty thing to have happen.
The FACT that you would put anything in a book that directs our young children to an obviously biased liberal website is horrible. It shows your agenda of indoctrinating our young children which is a deceitful thing to do. All three of my girls are being pulled from the Girl Scouts after my researching this.
Obviously you haven’t read the piece you’re commenting on. That’s okay. But I do feel bad that your girls are made to suffer. What a shame.
The FACT that you are staying so cool and collected in the face of such bizarre attacks by people who are clearly terrified of information is laudable–well done.
Thanks, Jen.:-)
I have been racking my brain to try to determine exactly why I find so many of the comments criticizing the Girl Scouts and Wendy Thomas Russell to be so utterly despicable. At first, I thought I was reacting to the fact that the inclusion of ONE WEBSITE ADDRESS has successfully derailed the entire message in a book—an amazingly positive message about empowerment and critical thinking and its importance to the futures of young girls. Then I thought I was reacting to the idea that parents who yank their girls out of scout programs are sending an incredibly powerful message TO THEIR DAUGHTERS that says: you are so incapable of reading information and deciding whether or not you agree with it that I must control all the ideas to which you are exposed (until, one supposes, said daughters are married off to husbands who will then take over this role of intellectual prophylactic.) But I think what’s bothering me goes deeper than that. Not once in this hailstorm of criticism has there been any discussion about fairness—no one is saying, “IF the Girl Scouts were going to include Media Matters, THEN they should also have included a reference to a right-wing conservative source so that girls could get both sides of the story.” I would actually agree with that. But these critics are not upset that a liberal website was referenced–they are incensed that the liberal website exists; that such ideas exist. These parents are apoplectic with rage that their children might come into contact with an idea that the parents don’t agree with. It’s intolerance. It’s the abject refusal to tolerate or respect contrary opinions or beliefs. Intolerance of one form or another is arguably at the root of some of the evil and insidious crimes against humanity. And it can start as simply as this—with a parent telling a daughter that she must not ever read an idea that might be different from her own; that she must never attempt to see another point of view; that ‘different’ equals ‘dangerous’. It’s how human beings can use love to breed hate—how we can take a trusting relationship between a parent and a child and use that to instill intolerance for anyone who doesn’t look, pray and think exactly like we do. It makes me sick.
I love banned books, and I’m glad you are looking at the entertainment factor in this!
Shall I consider my order of Thin Mints as a support of secular parenting? Maybe I should order more?
You should always — ALWAYS — order more Thin Mints.
Honestly, you couldn’t ask for and receive so much free publicity. This is awesome.
Thanks, Alan.
Applauds loudly!!!
Takes a humble bow.
That was an interesting post. Thank you.
I’ll say this, I cannot blame someone for thinking the author wrote what it appears the author wrote. In this particular, unusual circumstance, someone beyond your knowledge and control made a substantive change from a legitimate fact checking site that you wanted to one that is not legitimate. It is very strange and I hope someone gets to the bottom of how that happened. But I totally see who anyone would think you wrote it that way.
Again, that was interesting. Thanks. I’m following you now on Twitter, not because of this incident, but because I follow many authors on Twitter. I support authors 100% writing whatever it is they wish and I oppose censorship. I don’t support substantive changes made without the author’s knowledge and consent, and I’ll take a guess and say most authors would not want their own work to be changed in such a fashion.
Further, if you wrote a book a certain way, and it was substantially changed without your knowledge and consent, then removal of that essentially defective version of your work would not be censorship. Rather, the censorship if any occurred when your excellent example, Snopes, was censored out and replaced with a politically motivated and biased site instead. That’s what makes you look bad, the original negative change to your work, not that someone should think you wrote what it appears you wrote but actually didn’t. If I were you, I’d be very curious who did this to your work.
Thanks for reading — and following! — Dan. The book actually belongs to the Girl Scouts — I was merely a contracted writer — so I don’t think any changed would rise to the level of censorship in this particular case. Thanks again.
I knew it!!
Well sure!
Wow–You know Al Gore!
Who did you think told him to invent the Internet?
You’re so cool, Wendy. Seriously, you rock.